Skip to main content

Get Apache Wayang ready to test within 5 minutes

Struggling with delivery, architecture alignment, or platform stability?

I help teams fix systemic engineering issues: processes, architecture, and clarity.
→ See how I work with teams.


Hey followers, I often get ask how to get Apache Wayang (https://wayang.apache.org) up and running without having a full big data processing system behind. We heard you, we built a full fledged docker container, called BDE (Blossom Development Environment), which is basically Wayang. Here's the repo: https://github.com/databloom-ai/BDE

I made a short screencast how to get it running with Docker on OSX, and we also have made two hands-on videos to explain the first steps. Let's start with the basics - Docker. Get the whole platform with:

docker pull ghcr.io/databloom-ai/bde:main


At the end the Jupyter notebook address is shown, control-click on it (OS X); the browser should open and login you automatically:




Voila - done. You have now a full working Wayang environment, we prepared three notebooks to make it more easy to dive into. Watch our development tutorial video (part 1) to get a better understanding what Wayang can do, and what not. Click the video below: 








If you need help with distributed systems, backend engineering, or data platforms, check my Services.

Most read articles

Building a Model-Agnostic Multi-Agent System with OpenClaw

Over one week we rebuilt our AI stack around OpenClaw’s multi-agent architecture to avoid provider lock-in and stop wasting premium tokens. By aligning models to tasks, diversifying fallbacks across providers, enforcing minimal tool access, and switching to memory-first workflows with ephemeral sessions, we reduced token usage per task by about 70% and cut our monthly bill by 77% while improving operational resilience. How We Achieved 77% Cost Reduction and Provider Independence Over the past week, we rebuilt our AI infrastructure around OpenClaw’s multi-agent architecture. The result was a 77% cost reduction , provider independence , and a delegation system that routes work to the most cost-effective model for each job. Below is the technical journey of optimizing a 7-agent squad with OpenClaw. The Challenge: Model Provider Lock-In We started with a simple problem: our entire squad defaulted to a single model provider. This created three issues: Cost inefficiency beca...

BacNet => MQTT in Production: The Real Cost of Bridging BACnet to MQTT at Scale

bacnet2mqtt looks simple in a README and expensive in production. Once BACnet polling, reconnection behavior, stale state, and MQTT publishing collide, teams discover they are not deploying a lightweight adapter but operating infrastructure. This article breaks down where bacnet2mqtt works, where it becomes a bottleneck, and which production patterns reduce the operational damage before incidents, backlogs, and silent data loss turn a building integration into a long-running engineering problem. I inherited a building controls integration problem 18 months ago. Three office floors. 217 BACnet sensors covering temperature, occupancy, and HVAC actuators. The data was trapped inside the building automation network while the business wanted analytics, reporting, and compliance visibility in the data platform. The obvious answer looked easy enough: deploy bacnet2mqtt, bridge BACnet into MQTT, and push the stream into the lakehouse stack. The repository made it sound like a w...

Connect BACnet to the Cloud with bacnet-mqtt-gateway

The bacnet-mqtt-gateway project is an open source protocol bridge that translates BACnet building automation traffic into MQTT messages for cloud and IoT systems. It provides discovery, polling, bidirectional writes, APIs, security, and easy deployment via Docker. Many enterprises struggle to unify BACnet with modern data pipelines and cloud platforms because BACnet is local-network only and not cloud ready. This gateway provides a scalable, secure, production-ready adapter for MQTT ecosystems and smart building integrations. The Problem with BACnet Building automation runs on BACnet . HVAC controllers, lighting systems, metering equipment: they all speak ASHRAE 135 . The protocol handles local control loops well. It fails at cloud ingress. BACnet relies on UDP broadcasts. These do not route over the internet or into VPCs. Your chiller controller cannot talk to AWS IoT Core . Your VAV box cannot publish to an MQTT broker. The air gap between operational technology and modern cl...