Skip to main content

FreeIPA and Hadoop Distributions (HDP / CDH)

FreeIPA is the tool of choice when it comes to implement a security architecture from the scratch today. I don't need to praise the advantages of FreeIPA, it speaks for himself. It's the Swiss knife of user authentication, authorization and compliance.

To implement FreeIPA into Hadoop distributions like Hortonwork's HDP and Cloudera's CDH some tweaks are necessary, but the outcome is it worth. I assume that the FreeIPA server setup is done and the client tools are distributed. If not, the guide from Hortonworks has those steps included, too.

For Hortonworks, nothing more as the link to the documentation is necessary:
https://community.hortonworks.com/articles/59645/ambari-24-kerberos-with-freeipa.html

Ambari 2.4x has FreeIPA (Ambari-6432) support (experimental, but it works as promised) included. The setup and rollout is pretty simple and runs smoothly per Wizard.

For Cloudera it takes a bit more handwork, but it works at the end also perfect and well integrated, but not at the same UI level as Ambari. These steps are necessary to get Cloudera Manager working with FreeIPA:

1. create the CM principal in FreeIPA (example: cdh@ALO.ALT)
2. retrieve the keytab:
 ipa-getkeytab -r -s freeipa.alo.alt -p cdh -k cdh.keytab
3. install ipa-admintools on the Cloudera Manager server 
 yum install ipa-admintools -y
4. place the retrieval-script (from my GitHub) in /opt/cloudera/security/getkeytabs.sh (or another path accessible by cloudera manager), make it executable and owned by cloudera-scm
 chmod 775 /opt/cloudera/security/getkeytabs.sh && chown cloudera-scm: /opt/cloudera/security/getkeytabs.sh
5. Start the Kerberos wizard, but stop after verifying the cdh user
6. Set the configuration [1] for "Custom Kerberos Keytab Retrieval Script" to "/opt/cloudera/security/getkeytabs.sh"
7. resume the Kerberos wizard and follow the steps until its finished and restart the cluster.

Important:

The FreeIPA client from RHEL7 / CentOS 7 uses now memory based keytabs, but Java doesn't support them (yet). To switch back to the file based ticket cache, the config file (/etc/krb5.conf) needs to be altered by commenting default_ccache_name out, which let the client use the default file based ticket cache:


cat /etc/krb5.conf
..
# default_ccache_name = KEYRING:persistent:%{uid}
..


If you need help with distributed systems, backend engineering, or data platforms, check my Services.

Most read articles

Why Is Customer Obsession Disappearing?

Many companies trade real customer-obsession for automated, low-empathy support. Through examples from Coinbase, PayPal, GO Telecommunications and AT&T, this article shows how reliance on AI chatbots, outsourced call centers, and KPI-driven workflows erodes trust, NPS and customer retention. It argues that human-centric support—treating support as strategic investment instead of cost—is still a core growth engine in competitive markets. It's wild that even with all the cool tech we've got these days, like AI solving complex equations and doing business across time zones in a flash, so many companies are still struggling with the basics: taking care of their customers. The drama around Coinbase's customer support is a prime example of even tech giants messing up. And it's not just Coinbase — it's a big-picture issue for the whole industry. At some point, the idea of "customer obsession" got replaced with "customer automation," and no...

What the Heck is Superposition and Entanglement?

This post is about superposition and interference in simple, intuitive terms. It describes how quantum states combine, how probability amplitudes add, and why interference patterns appear in systems such as electrons, photons and waves. The goal is to give a clear, non mathematical understanding of how quantum behavior emerges from the rules of wave functions and measurement. If you’ve ever heard the words superposition or entanglement thrown around in conversations about quantum physics, you may have nodded politely while your brain quietly filed them away in the "too confusing to deal with" folder.  These aren't just theoretical quirks; they're the foundation of mind-bending tech like Google's latest quantum chip, the Willow with its 105 qubits. Superposition challenges our understanding of reality, suggesting that particles don't have definite states until observed. This principle is crucial in quantum technologies, enabling phenomena like quantum comp...

SynthLink Compared to Google’s Natural Questions: A Practical Evaluation

SynthLink evaluates reasoning, synthesis and internal consistency across diverse question types. Google’s Natural Questions evaluates extractive QA: finding short text spans inside structured documents. Because real workloads require interpretation, abstraction and multi-step logic, SynthLink exposes capabilities and failure modes that NQ cannot measure. The two benchmarks are complementary, but SynthLink is more aligned with production tasks. Benchmarks such as Google’s Natural Questions (NQ) dominate model evaluation. They provide a reliable, academically stable test for extractive question answering: short queries, grounded answers, and constrained context ranges. But real workloads rarely look like NQ. Production systems must handle ambiguous inputs, multi-step reasoning, poorly structured prompts, and cases where no canonical answer exists. SynthLink was designed for this broader landscape. It focuses on evaluating reasoning, synthesis and internal consistency rather than snippe...