Skip to main content

Building RPMs with Maven for Reliable Software Deployment

This article explains how to package applications as revisionable RPM artifacts using Maven, a technique that remains valuable for DevOps and platform engineering teams who operate in controlled, reproducible, or air-gapped environments. It covers prerequisites, rpm-maven-plugin configuration, directory mappings, permissions, and how to integrate RPM creation into CI pipelines to deliver consistent deployment units for Java services.

Modern DevOps Packaging: Building RPMs with Maven for Reliable Software Deployment

In modern DevOps and platform engineering, one of the most underrated tools is still the RPM. Even with the rise of containers, many organizations rely on RPM-based delivery to manage internal services, JVM applications, and deployment flows in secure or air-gapped environments. A revisionable, reproducible, OS-native package is often the cleanest way to promote artifacts through development, staging, and production.

Back in 2015, the motivation was simple: create a dependable deployment mechanism that supports installation, upgrades, and rollbacks. That need has not gone away. Today, with CI/CD pipelines and infrastructure automation everywhere, packaging software as an RPM is still a valid and often required delivery method.

Prerequisites

To build RPMs with Maven, you need the following environment:

  • A Linux system such as Red Hat, AlmaLinux, or CentOS
  • Maven installed and working via mvn
  • Git available on the command line
  • RPM build tools installed:
    sudo yum install rpm-build

The workflow is especially useful for Java web applications where the build produces a .war or other deployable artifact.

Building the Project

Before creating the RPM, ensure the project builds successfully so that the target output is available locally. If local tests fail due to missing dependencies (like MongoDB, Tomcat, etc.), you can bypass them with:

mvn clean install -DskipTests

The rpm-maven-plugin uses several parameters to determine how your files should be installed on the target system:

  • directory — where the files will be installed
  • filemode — file permissions for deployment
  • username and groupname — ownership of installed files
  • location — the build-artifact source location

Configuring the RPM Plugin in Your pom.xml

Add the following plugin configuration to your Maven build:

<project>
  ...
  <build>
    <plugins>
      <plugin>
        <groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
        <artifactId>rpm-maven-plugin</artifactId>
        <executions>
          <execution>
            <id>generate-rpm</id>
            <goals>
              <goal>rpm</goal>
            </goals>
          </execution>
        </executions>

        <configuration>
          <license>Apache</license>
          <distribution>Development</distribution>
          <group>Applications/Internet</group>
          <packager>ALO</packager>

          <defineStatements>
            <defineStatement>_unpackaged_files_terminate_build 0</defineStatement>
          </defineStatements>

          <mappings>
            <mapping>
              <directory>/var/lib/tomcat/webapps</directory>
              <filemode>600</filemode>
              <username>tomcat</username>
              <groupname>tomcat</groupname>
              <directoryIncluded>false</directoryIncluded>
              <sources>
                <source>
                  <location>target/test.war</location>
                </source>
              </sources>
            </mapping>
          </mappings>

          <preinstallScriptlet>
            <script>echo "Deploying test-api webapp"</script>
          </preinstallScriptlet>
        </configuration>
      </plugin>
    </plugins>
  </build>
</project>

Building and Inspecting the RPM

Run the RPM build step:

mvn rpm:rpm

After the build completes, you can inspect the RPM contents using:

rpm -q --filesbypkg -p target/rpm/<build-name>/RPMS/noarch/test-api-0.0.1-1.noarch.rpm

This ensures that the packaging layout, permissions, ownership, and file placement match what you expect before deploying the artifact to production environments or CI-based promotion pipelines.

Why This Still Matters in 2025

Even in a world dominated by containers, building RPMs remains a practical approach for teams working with legacy systems, controlled production environments, or hybrid setups where OS-level packaging is still the most reliable delivery path. Maven provides an easy and repeatable way to create these artifacts, making RPM packaging a natural fit in modern CI/CD workflows.

If you need help with distributed systems, backend engineering, or data platforms, check my Services.

Most read articles

Building a Model-Agnostic Multi-Agent System with OpenClaw

Over one week we rebuilt our AI stack around OpenClaw’s multi-agent architecture to avoid provider lock-in and stop wasting premium tokens. By aligning models to tasks, diversifying fallbacks across providers, enforcing minimal tool access, and switching to memory-first workflows with ephemeral sessions, we reduced token usage per task by about 70% and cut our monthly bill by 77% while improving operational resilience. How We Achieved 77% Cost Reduction and Provider Independence Over the past week, we rebuilt our AI infrastructure around OpenClaw’s multi-agent architecture. The result was a 77% cost reduction , provider independence , and a delegation system that routes work to the most cost-effective model for each job. Below is the technical journey of optimizing a 7-agent squad with OpenClaw. The Challenge: Model Provider Lock-In We started with a simple problem: our entire squad defaulted to a single model provider. This created three issues: Cost inefficiency beca...

Why Is Customer Obsession Disappearing?

Many companies trade real customer-obsession for automated, low-empathy support. Through examples from Coinbase, PayPal, GO Telecommunications and AT&T, this article shows how reliance on AI chatbots, outsourced call centers, and KPI-driven workflows erodes trust, NPS and customer retention. It argues that human-centric support—treating support as strategic investment instead of cost—is still a core growth engine in competitive markets. It's wild that even with all the cool tech we've got these days, like AI solving complex equations and doing business across time zones in a flash, so many companies are still struggling with the basics: taking care of their customers. The drama around Coinbase's customer support is a prime example of even tech giants messing up. And it's not just Coinbase — it's a big-picture issue for the whole industry. At some point, the idea of "customer obsession" got replaced with "customer automation," and no...

What are the performance implications of cross-platform execution within Wayang?

Apache Wayang ® enables cross-platform execution across multiple data processing platforms such as Spark, Flink, Java Streams, PostgreSQL or GraphChi. This capability fundamentally changes the performance behavior of distributed data pipelines. Wayang reduces manual data movement by selecting where each operator should run, but crossing platform boundaries still introduces serialization cost, shifts in locality, different memory strategies and new tuning constraints. Understanding these dynamics is essential before adopting Wayang for multi-platform pipelines at scale. Apache Wayang is a cross-platform data processing framework that lets developers run a single logical pipeline across engines such as Apache Spark, Apache Flink or a native Java backend. It provides an abstraction layer and a cost-based optimizer that selects the execution platform for each operator. This flexibility introduces new performance variables that do not exist in single-engine systems. Engine boundaries ...