Skip to main content

XAttr are coming to HDFS

Listen:
HDFS 2006 [1] describes the use of Extended Attributes. XAttr, known from *NIX Operating Systems, connects physically stored data with describing metadata above the strictly defined attributes by the filesystem. Mostly used to provide additional information, like hash, checksum, encoding or security relevant information like signature or author / creator.
According to the source code [2] the use of xattr can be configured by dfs.namenode.fs-limits.max-xattrs-per-inode and dfs.namenode.fs-limits.max-xattr-size in hdfs-default.xml. The default for dfs.namenode.fs-limits.max-xattrs-per-inode is 32, for dfs.namenode.fs-limits.max-xattr-size the default is 16384.

Within HDFS, the extended user attributes will be stored in the user namespace as an identifier.The identifier has four namespaces, like the Linux FS kernel implementation has: security, system, trusted and user. Only the superuser can access the trusted namespaces (system and security).
The xattr definitions are free and can be interpreted by additional tools like security frameworks, backup systems, per API or similar. Additionally, the attributes are case-sensitive and the namespace interpretes the definition as it is (case-insensitive).

An attribute can be set per dfs command like this:

hadoop dfs -setfattr -n 'alo.enc_default' -v UTF8 /user/alo/definition_table.txt

and can be read per:

hadoop dfs -getfattr -d /user/alo/definition_table.txt

# file: /user/alo/definition_table.txt
user.enc_default='UTF8'


HDFS 2006 is already committed [3] and will be available in HDFS 2.5.x, is enabled per default and will have no impact on performance if you don't use them.

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2006

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Deal with corrupted messages in Apache Kafka

Under some strange circumstances, it can happen that a message in a Kafka topic is corrupted. This often happens when using 3rd party frameworks with Kafka. In addition, Kafka < 0.9 does not have a lock on Log.read() at the consumer read level, but does have a lock on Log.write(). This can lead to a rare race condition as described in KAKFA-2477 [1]. A likely log entry looks like this: ERROR Error processing message, stopping consumer: (kafka.tools.ConsoleConsumer$) kafka.message.InvalidMessageException: Message is corrupt (stored crc = xxxxxxxxxx, computed crc = yyyyyyyyyy Kafka-Tools Kafka stores the offset of each consumer in Zookeeper. To read the offsets, Kafka provides handy tools [2]. But you can also use zkCli.sh, at least to display the consumer and the stored offsets. First we need to find the consumer for a topic (> Kafka 0.9): bin/kafka-consumer-groups.sh --zookeeper management01:2181 --describe --group test Prior to Kafka 0.9, the only way to get this inform

Hive query shows ERROR "too many counters"

A hive job face the odd " Too many counters:"  like Ended Job = job_xxxxxx with exception 'org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.counters.LimitExceededException(Too many counters: 201 max=200)' FAILED: Execution Error, return code 1 from org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.exec.MapRedTask Intercepting System.exit(1) These happens when operators are used in queries ( Hive Operators ). Hive creates 4 counters per operator, max upto 1000, plus a few additional counters like file read/write, partitions and tables. Hence the number of counter required is going to be dependent upon the query.  To avoid such exception, configure " mapreduce.job.counters.max " in mapreduce-site.xml to a value above 1000. Hive will fail when he is hitting the 1k counts, but other MR jobs not. A number around 1120 should be a good choice. Using " EXPLAIN EXTENDED " and " grep -ri operators | wc -l " print out the used numbers of operators. Use this value to tweak the MR s

AI's False Reality: Understanding Hallucination

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has leapfrogged to the poster child of technological innovation, on track to transform industries in a scale similar to the Industrial Revolution of the 1800s. But in this case, as cutting-edge technology, AI presents its own unique challenge, exploiting our human behavior of "love to trust", we as humans face a challenge: AI hallucinations. This phenomenon, where AI models generate outputs that are factually incorrect, misleading, or entirely fabricated, raises complex questions about the reliability and trust of AI models and larger systems. The tendency for AI to hallucinate comes from several interrelated factors. Overfitting – a condition where models become overly specialized to their training data – can lead to confident but wildly inaccurate responses when presented with novel scenarios (Guo et al., 2017). Moreover, biases embedded within datasets shape the models' understanding of the world; if these datasets are flawed or unreprese