Skip to main content

How HDFS protects your data

Listen:
Often we get questions how HDFS protects data and what the mechanisms are to prevent data corruption. Eric Sammer explain this en detail in Hadoop Operations.

Additional to the points below, you can also have a second cluster to sync the files, simply to prevent human being failures, like deleting a subset of data. If you have enough space in your cluster, enabling the trash per core-site.xml and setting to a higher value then a day helps too.

<property>
<name>fs.trash.interval</name>
<value>1440</value>
<description>Number of minutes after which the checkpoint
gets deleted. If zero, the trash feature is disabled. 1440 means 1 day
</description>
</property>
<property>

<name>fs.trash.checkpoint.interval</name>
<value>15</value>
<description>Number of minutes between trash checkpoints.
Should be smaller or equal to fs.trash.interval.
Every time the checkpointer runs it creates a new checkpoint
out of current and removes checkpoints created more than
fs.trash.interval minutes ago.
</description>
</property>


HDFS is designed to protect data in different ways to minimize the risk of data loss with a valuable write speed. This enables in some circumstances HDFS as a NAS replacement for large files with the possibility to quickly access the stored data. The illustration below simplify the data flow:

HDFS has per default the following mechanisms implemented:
  1. Data written to files in HDFS is split up into chunks (usually 128MB in size). Each chunk (called a block) is replicated three times, by default, to three different machines. Multiple copies of a block are never written to the same machine. Replication level is configurable per file. 
  2. HDFS actively monitors the number of available replicas of each block, compared to the intended replication level. If, for some reason, a disk or node in the cluster should become unavailable, the filesystem will repair the missing block(s) by creating new replicas from the remaining copies of the data.
  3. HDFS can be (and normally is) configured to place block replicas across multiple racks of machines to protect against catastrophic failure of an entire rack or its constituent network infrastructure. This is called RackAwareness and should reflect your topology.
  4. Each block has an associated checksum computed on write, which is verified on all subsequent reads. Additionally, to protect against "bit rot" of files (and their blocks) that are not regularly read, the filesystem automatically verifies all checksums of all blocks on a regular basis. Should any checksum not verify correctly, HDFS will automatically detect this, discard the bad block, and create a new replica of the block.
  5. Filesystem metadata - information about object ownership, permissions, replication level, path, and so on - is served by a highly available pair of machines (i.e. namenodes) in CDH4. Updates to metadata are maintained in a traditional write-ahead transaction log that guarantees durability of changes to metadata information. The transaction log can be written to multiple physical disks and, in a highly available configuration, is written to multiple machines.
  6. HDFS block replicas are written in a synchronous, in-line replication pipeline. That is, when a client application receives a successful response from the cluster that a write was successful, it is true that at least a configurable minimum number of replicas are also complete. This eliminates the potential failure case of asynchronous replication where a client could complete a write to a node, receive a successful response, only for that one node to fail before it's able to replicate to another node.
  7. HDFS is fully instrumented with metric collection and reporting so monitoring systems (such as Cloudera Manager) can generate alerts when faults are detected. Metrics related to data integrity include unresponsive nodes in the cluster, failed disks, missing blocks, corrupt blocks, under-replicated blocks, and so on. Cloudera Manager has extensive HDFS-specific monitoring configured out of the box.
  8. HDFS supports directory-level filesystem quotas to protect against accidental denial of service attacks that could otherwise cause critical applications to fail to write data to the cluster.
  9. All higher level data storage and processing systems in CDH (MapReduce, HBase, Hive, Pig, Impala) use HDFS as their underlying storage substrate and, as a result, have the same data protection guarantees described above.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Is Customer Obsession Disappearing?

 It's wild that even with all the cool tech we've got these days, like AI solving complex equations and doing business across time zones in a flash, so many companies are still struggling with the basics: taking care of their customers.The drama around Coinbase's customer support is a prime example of even tech giants messing up. And it's not just Coinbase — it's a big-picture issue for the whole industry. At some point, the idea of "customer obsession" got replaced with "customer automation," and now we're seeing the problems that came with it. "Cases" What Not to Do Coinbase, as main example, has long been synonymous with making cryptocurrency accessible. Whether you’re a first-time buyer or a seasoned trader, their platform was once the gold standard for user experience. But lately, their customer support practices have been making headlines for all the wrong reasons: Coinbase - Stuck in the Loop:  Users have reported being caugh...

MySQL Scaling in 2024

When your MySQL database reaches its performance limits, vertical scaling through hardware upgrades provides a temporary solution. Long-term growth, though, requires a more comprehensive approach. This involves optimizing the database strategically and integrating complementary technologies. Caching The implementation of a caching layer, such as Memcached or Redis , can result in a notable reduction in the load and an increase ni performance at MySQL. In-memory stores cache data that is accessed frequently, enabling near-instantaneous responses and freeing the database for other tasks. For applications with heavy read traffic on relatively static data (e.g. product catalogues, user profiles), caching represents a low-effort, high-impact solution. Consider a online shop product catalogue with thousands of items. With each visit to the website, the application queries the database in order to retrieve product details. By using caching, the retrieved details can be stored in Memcached (a...

Deal with corrupted messages in Apache Kafka

Under some strange circumstances, it can happen that a message in a Kafka topic is corrupted. This often happens when using 3rd party frameworks with Kafka. In addition, Kafka < 0.9 does not have a lock on Log.read() at the consumer read level, but does have a lock on Log.write(). This can lead to a rare race condition as described in KAKFA-2477 [1]. A likely log entry looks like this: ERROR Error processing message, stopping consumer: (kafka.tools.ConsoleConsumer$) kafka.message.InvalidMessageException: Message is corrupt (stored crc = xxxxxxxxxx, computed crc = yyyyyyyyyy Kafka-Tools Kafka stores the offset of each consumer in Zookeeper. To read the offsets, Kafka provides handy tools [2]. But you can also use zkCli.sh, at least to display the consumer and the stored offsets. First we need to find the consumer for a topic (> Kafka 0.9): bin/kafka-consumer-groups.sh --zookeeper management01:2181 --describe --group test Prior to Kafka 0.9, the only way to get this in...