Skip to main content

Enable Replication in HBase

Listen:

HBase does have support for multi-site replication for disaster recovery, it is not a HA solution, the application and solution architecture will need to implement HA. This means that data from one cluster is automatically replicated to a backup cluster, this can within the same data center or across data centers. There are 3 ways to configure this, master-slave, master-master, and cyclic replication. Master slave is the simplest solution for DR as data is written to the master and replicated to the configured slave(s). Master-Master means that the two clusters cross replicate edits, however have means to prevent replication going into an infinite loop by tracking mutations using the HBase cluster ID. Cyclic replication is supported which means you can have multiple clusters replicating to each other these can be in combinations of master-master, master-slave.
Replication relies on the WAL, the WAL edits are replayed from a source region server to a target region server.

A few important points:
1) Version alignment, in a replicated environment the versions of HBase and Hadoop/HDFS must be aligned, this means you must replicate to the same version of HBase/HDFS (> 0.92)
2) Don't use HBase for Zookeeper deployment, deploy separate Zookeeper Quorums for each cluster that are user managed.
3) You need full network connectivity between all nodes in all clusters, that is Node 1 on cluster A must be able to reach Node 2 on Cluster B and so on, this applies to the Zookeeper clusters as well.
4) All tables and their corresponding column families must exist on every cluster within the replication configuration, these must be named identically.
5) Don't enable HLog compression, this will cause replication to fail.

6) Do not use start_replication nor stop_replication, this will cause data loss on the replicated side

Getting Started

Step 1:
To enable replication all clusters in the replication configuration must add the following to their configuration:
property= hbase.replication
value = true


Step 2:

Launch the hbase shell and set the replication:
hbase(main):001:0> alter 'your_table', {NAME => 'family_name', REPLICATION_SCOPE => '1'}

Next add a peer:
hbase(main):002:0> add_peer '1', "zk1,zk4:2181:/hbase-backup

You can list the currently enabled peers by 
hbase(main):003:0> list_peers 

There are some other considerations too, in your slave peers, it would be worth increasing the TTL on the tables, this means that accidental or malicious deletes can be recovered, you can also increase the min versions property so that more history is retained on the slaves to cover more scenarios. As mentioned this is not a cross site HA solution, there is no automated cut over, this means there is work at the application and operational level to facilitate this. To disable the replication, simply use:
hbase(main):004:0> disable_peer("1")

Note, disabling enabling a table at the source cluster will not affect the current replication, it will start from the 0 offset and replicate any entry which is scoped for replication if present in it. To move into a fresh state, you have to roll the logs on the source cluster. This means, after you have removed the peer, you have to force a manual file roll per hbase shell:
hbase(main):009:0> hlog_roll 'localhost,60020,1365483729051'

It takes servername as an argument. You can get the regionservers name from the znode (/hbase/rs).
When you now re-enable the peer, the replication starts with a fresh state.

Links:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Deal with corrupted messages in Apache Kafka

Under some strange circumstances, it can happen that a message in a Kafka topic is corrupted. This often happens when using 3rd party frameworks with Kafka. In addition, Kafka < 0.9 does not have a lock on Log.read() at the consumer read level, but does have a lock on Log.write(). This can lead to a rare race condition as described in KAKFA-2477 [1]. A likely log entry looks like this: ERROR Error processing message, stopping consumer: (kafka.tools.ConsoleConsumer$) kafka.message.InvalidMessageException: Message is corrupt (stored crc = xxxxxxxxxx, computed crc = yyyyyyyyyy Kafka-Tools Kafka stores the offset of each consumer in Zookeeper. To read the offsets, Kafka provides handy tools [2]. But you can also use zkCli.sh, at least to display the consumer and the stored offsets. First we need to find the consumer for a topic (> Kafka 0.9): bin/kafka-consumer-groups.sh --zookeeper management01:2181 --describe --group test Prior to Kafka 0.9, the only way to get this inform

Hive query shows ERROR "too many counters"

A hive job face the odd " Too many counters:"  like Ended Job = job_xxxxxx with exception 'org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.counters.LimitExceededException(Too many counters: 201 max=200)' FAILED: Execution Error, return code 1 from org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.exec.MapRedTask Intercepting System.exit(1) These happens when operators are used in queries ( Hive Operators ). Hive creates 4 counters per operator, max upto 1000, plus a few additional counters like file read/write, partitions and tables. Hence the number of counter required is going to be dependent upon the query.  To avoid such exception, configure " mapreduce.job.counters.max " in mapreduce-site.xml to a value above 1000. Hive will fail when he is hitting the 1k counts, but other MR jobs not. A number around 1120 should be a good choice. Using " EXPLAIN EXTENDED " and " grep -ri operators | wc -l " print out the used numbers of operators. Use this value to tweak the MR s

AI's False Reality: Understanding Hallucination

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has leapfrogged to the poster child of technological innovation, on track to transform industries in a scale similar to the Industrial Revolution of the 1800s. But in this case, as cutting-edge technology, AI presents its own unique challenge, exploiting our human behavior of "love to trust", we as humans face a challenge: AI hallucinations. This phenomenon, where AI models generate outputs that are factually incorrect, misleading, or entirely fabricated, raises complex questions about the reliability and trust of AI models and larger systems. The tendency for AI to hallucinate comes from several interrelated factors. Overfitting – a condition where models become overly specialized to their training data – can lead to confident but wildly inaccurate responses when presented with novel scenarios (Guo et al., 2017). Moreover, biases embedded within datasets shape the models' understanding of the world; if these datasets are flawed or unreprese