Apache Iceberg® provides the table layer that turns cloud object storage into a reliable data platform, adding schemas, snapshots and governance to otherwise unstructured storage. The architect’s role is to ensure Kafka, Flink, Spark, Trino and AI workloads can share Iceberg tables without blocking or interfering with one another. Long-term stability depends on clear decisions around partitioning, layout, schema evolution and retention, all of which determine how performance behaves over years, not just quarters. Iceberg creates a consistent data contract that unifies IoT ingestion, real-time analytics and machine-learning pipelines. But without strong ownership and stewardship, it can quickly degrade into a disorganized collection of tables that are costly, inconsistent and difficult to operate.
Apache Iceberg is the table format that turned data lakes into data platforms. It adds schemas, snapshots and governance on top of cheap object storage. On its own Iceberg is not an architecture. Real value appears when architects connect Kafka, Flink, batch engines, governance and machine learning to the same Iceberg layer in a controlled way.
This article describes how to lead Iceberg based data platforms from an architecture point of view. It is not a feature list. It is a guide for how to think, which decisions matter and where platforms fail in practice.
1. Why Iceberg sits at the center of modern data platforms
Before Iceberg, data platforms had two unstable extremes. Either everything was inside a data warehouse with strong control but weak flexibility. Or everything lived as loose files in S3, GCS or HDFS with flexibility but almost no guarantees.
Iceberg gives a middle ground:
- Tables instead of folders: queries and jobs work with tables, not raw paths.
- Snapshots: every write creates a snapshot that can be queried time travel style.
- Schema evolution: safe add or drop of columns without rewriting all data.
- Partition spec: logical partitioning that hides physical layout details.
- Metadata for planning: manifests and statistics for efficient query planning.
This design lets multiple engines read and write the same table without locking the platform to a single vendor. That is the core leadership decision: Iceberg as the stable contract between producers, consumers and compute engines.
2. Architecture principles for Iceberg based platforms
Architecture leadership for Iceberg can be summarised into a few principles.
2.1 Iceberg is the contract, not just a storage choice
In a mature platform every team that produces or consumes data does that through Iceberg tables. The table schema, partition spec, retention and access control describe a clear contract. Raw files exist only in controlled landing zones and are cleaned up or converted quickly.
If teams bypass Iceberg and drop random files into buckets, the system turns into a fragile data swamp. The architect must prevent this by making Iceberg the easiest and default integration path.
2.2 Separate landing, processing and serving zones
A typical Iceberg platform keeps three main storage zones:
- Landing: temporary area for raw files or Kafka offload. Short retention and strict automation.
- Processing: internal Iceberg tables for joins, enrichments and quality checks.
- Serving: curated Iceberg tables that are stable contracts for analytics, IoT dashboards and AI workloads.
This separation reduces coupling. Producers can change landing details while serving tables remain stable for business use cases.
2.3 Multi engine by design, not as an afterthought
Real platforms do not run on a single engine. Kafka, Flink, Spark, Trino, DuckDB, Snowflake, BigQuery or internal engines may all touch the same Iceberg tables. Architecture leadership means planning for that from day one:
- Use compatible versions of Iceberg libraries across engines.
- Standardise on one catalog implementation where possible.
- Define clear write ownership: usually one engine or one job family owns writes to a table.
- Define read expectations: latency, freshness, isolation level.
Without that alignment teams will discover subtle incompatibilities only in production.
3. How Iceberg ties together Kafka, Flink, IoT and AI Platform
The power of Iceberg appears when you connect it to the rest of the architecture spine.
3.1 Kafka to Iceberg as the central ingestion bridge
Kafka captures operational events, IoT messages and application logs. Iceberg is where those streams become durable history. An architecture leadership pattern is:
- Standard event schemas in Kafka with versioning rules.
- Streaming jobs that map events into one or more Iceberg tables.
- Data quality checks before commits to critical serving tables.
- Backfill strategy using the same write path that streaming jobs use.
This pattern prevents a long list of ad hoc one off sinks and keeps data lineage clear.
3.2 Flink as the continuous transformer into Iceberg
Flink is a natural fit for continuous ingestion and transformation into Iceberg. It can read from Kafka, apply stateful transformations, join with reference data and write into partitioned Iceberg tables.
Leadership decisions include:
- Which tables are written by Flink as streaming sinks and which remain batch only.
- Checkpoint and commit alignment so Iceberg snapshots are consistent.
- How to handle out of order and late events with watermark logic and upserts.
- How to recover from failures without creating duplicate data or gaps.
Done well, this creates a low latency path from operational events into queryable tables without special pipelines for each consumer.
3.3 IoT platforms writing into stable Iceberg contracts
IoT systems send large volumes of noisy data. Devices, gateways and field systems change more often than core business processes. The Iceberg architect protects the core platform from that churn.
A common pattern:
- Gateways publish IoT data into Kafka topics with well defined schemas.
- Flink or other jobs normalise units, timestamps and identities into Iceberg tables.
- Downstream aggregations create per device, per site or per time window views for dashboards.
Iceberg tables form the stable anchor that operations, analytics and machine learning can trust, even while device firmware changes frequently.
3.4 AI Platform using Iceberg as feature and training store
An AI platform needs reproducible training data and features. Iceberg offers:
- Time travel snapshots for reproducible training.
- Partitioned feature tables for efficient model scoring.
- Central governance for sensitive features and access control.
The architecture question is not whether the AI platform supports Iceberg. The question is how feature pipelines, model training and batch or streaming inference share Iceberg tables without conflicts. This needs standards for row keys, event time, feature naming and retention.
4. Table design: schema, partitioning and layout
Most Iceberg incidents trace back to poor table design rather than Iceberg itself. Architecture leadership means providing guardrails for schema and layout.
4.1 Schemas that are stable but not frozen
Good schemas:
- Use clear names and types that match domain language.
- Use optional fields for values that may be missing.
- Prefer additive changes over destructive ones.
- Avoid over normalisation that forces many small joins for simple questions.
The architect should define schema evolution rules at the platform level. For example, who can add a column, who can remove one and which approvals are needed for breaking changes.
4.2 Partitioning for queries and operations, not only for ingestion
Partitioning decides performance and cost. The default pattern of partition by date only is rarely enough. Instead, start from query patterns:
- Time partitioning for recent data access and retention.
- Partition by customer, region or device where queries focus on subsets.
- Use Iceberg transforms such as bucket or truncate for high cardinality keys.
The architect owns the guidance for when to use which strategy so that teams do not create huge partitions or billions of tiny files.
4.3 Layout and compaction strategies
Iceberg can deal with many files but performance still suffers if layout is ignored. Leadership patterns include:
- Background compaction jobs with clear service level objectives.
- Separation of write path from compaction to avoid blocking ingestion.
- Metrics on average file size, small file ratios and skewed partitions.
Without compaction and layout governance query times will slowly increase over months until the platform looks slow and expensive.
5. Governance, catalogs and data ownership
Iceberg uses catalogs to find tables, track metadata and integrate with access control. Many teams underestimate how central the catalog is.
5.1 Catalog choices and multi environment design
The platform will usually have several environments such as development, staging and production. Leadership decisions include:
- One catalog per environment or logical separation inside a shared catalog.
- Naming conventions for databases, schemas and tables.
- How to migrate tables between environments without breaking lineage.
It is worth standardising this early. Retrofitting consistent names after hundreds of tables exist is painful.
5.2 Ownership model for tables
Every Iceberg table should have a clear owner, not just a technical team. A simple but effective contract:
- Product or domain team owns the meaning and quality of the data.
- Platform or data engineering team owns the technical operation and performance.
- Governance or security function owns access policies and compliance rules.
Ownership must be visible in the catalog through tags or metadata fields so that people know who to talk to when changes are needed.
6. Cost, retention and lifecycle management
Iceberg can reduce cost when used correctly because it uses cheap object storage and pushes compute to flexible engines. It can also become expensive if retention and lifecycle are unmanaged.
6.1 Retention by design, not by cleanup projects
Each table should declare retention rules from the start:
- How long raw data is kept in landing.
- How long snapshots are kept for time travel.
- Whether data is compacted into long term archives.
Use Iceberg snapshot expiration and delete semantics as part of the design, not as a later optimisation.
6.2 Observability for storage and query cost
Architecture leadership includes providing visibility. At minimum:
- Storage usage per table and per domain.
- Query counts and runtimes per table.
- Compaction job metrics and failure rates.
This lets teams see the cost impact of their schemas, partitions and usage patterns and encourages better design without central teams blocking every change.
7. Typical failure modes in Iceberg platforms
Understanding how platforms fail helps you set the right guardrails.
- Ad hoc tables everywhere: developers create one table per experiment, leading to unmaintainable catalogs.
- No partitioning strategy: default layouts lead to slow queries and costly rewrites later.
- Multiple writers with no coordination: conflicting writes create unstable snapshots.
- No lifecycle policies: storage and metadata grow without bounds, making the system hard to operate.
- Poor governance: sensitive data appears in public tables without clear access rules.
Leadership is about making these failure modes unlikely with standards, templates and automation.
8. Role of the Iceberg architect and platform leader
An Iceberg architecture leader is not the person who writes every pipeline. Their work is to establish patterns that make good platforms the default outcome.
Key responsibilities:
- Define reference architectures that connect Kafka, Flink, IoT, AI platforms and Iceberg.
- Define table design standards for schemas, partitioning and lifecycle.
- Create blueprints and starter templates for teams building new domains.
- Work with security and governance on access and compliance.
- Review critical tables and shared datasets where many teams depend on the same contract.
With this in place Iceberg becomes the quiet center of the platform. Teams can move fast on top of it without daily involvement from the architect.
9. Bringing it together
Iceberg data platform architecture leadership is about combining a clear technical vision with practical guardrails. Iceberg provides the table abstraction, but architecture leadership decides how real systems use it.
When you connect Kafka, Flink, IoT systems and AI platforms through well designed Iceberg tables, you get a platform that can evolve for years without constant rewrites. That is the real payoff of this pillar in your overall architecture spine.
If you need help with distributed systems, backend engineering, or data platforms, check my Services.